GAT-Ship Alternative for Modern Port Agencies

GAT-Ship has run port calls for agents since 1995 and its incumbency is real, thirty years of maturity and a deep Nordic customer base. Base is the modern alternative for agencies that want the same port call workflow plus native financial management, real-time principal visibility through Base Connect, and embedded compliance and intelligence data built into the platform. This is the most direct head-to-head in the category, and we will be honest about the tradeoffs.

Part of our 10-tool port agency software comparison

GAT-Ship
Agent ops, since 1995
Port calls, SOFs, NOR
PDA and FDA generation
REST API export to accounting
Base
Agent ops + finance + intelligence
Port calls, SOFs, NOR, crew
Native QuickBooks and Xero sync
Principal portal and embedded intelligence

Since 1995

GAT-Ship incumbency advantage in port agency

Per-user

Base pricing model vs GAT-Ship per-port-call

Built-in

Native QuickBooks and Xero sync out of the box

Base Connect

Principal portal Base has, GAT-Ship does not

GAT-Ship vs Base: The Modern Stack for Port Agency Operations

Both tools run the port call workflow. The real differences show up in financial management, principal visibility, and embedded intelligence. Here is the honest side-by-side.

Today
With Base
Port call operations, SOF, NOR, crew handled well
Same port call workflow, plus native financial management
REST API export to external accounting systems
Native QuickBooks and Xero sync out of the box
No principal portal, DAs shared via email after close
Base Connect gives principals real-time visibility
No embedded sanctions, vessel compliance, or tariff
Embedded intelligence lives inside the port call flow
Thirty years of maturity, strong Nordic presence
Modern platform, growing global, built for current stack
Per-port-call pricing, cheaper at low volume
Per-user tiers, predictable as your agency scales

Feature Comparison

A side-by-side spec sheet for the questions buyers actually ask in evaluations.

Feature GAT-Ship Base
Built forPort agents, ops focusedPort agents, ops + finance + intelligence
Port call operations (SOF, NOR, crew)
PDA and FDA generation
Vendor management and PO trackingPartial
Native QuickBooks and Xero sync (REST API export) (out of the box)
Multi-stage invoice approvals
OCR AP automation
Principal portal / cost visibility (Base Connect)
Embedded sanctions screening
Embedded vessel compliance data
Tariff and HTS lookup
Pricing modelPer-port-callPer-user, transparent tiers
Years on market30 (since 1995)Modern platform for current maritime stack
Customer base100,000+ port calls/year, strong Nordic presenceMaritime operations focus, growing global

Based on public documentation as of April 2026. If anything is wrong, tell us and we will correct it.

Accounting Sync
Base
port call ledger
QuickBooks
synced live
FDA-4418 approvedStage 3 of 3
Vendor bill OCRPO matched

Financial Management: Native vs Export

GAT-Ship handles the port call well and exports to your accounting system through its REST API. That is a project. Base runs multi-stage invoice approvals, OCR AP automation, and native QuickBooks integration or Xero sync inside the same platform. The finance side does not live somewhere else.

Principal Visibility: Base Connect

GAT-Ship has no principal portal. Your principals see the DA by email after the fact and every charge question turns into a round-trip. Base Connect gives principals real-time visibility into the same audit trail you see, on the port call that is still open. No more back-and-forth on line items.

Principal View, Base Connect
Port call, Rotterdam
PDA building, live
Bunker deliveryLogged
Stevedore chargesPreview
Audit trailShared live

When GAT-Ship Is the Better Choice

GAT-Ship is a mature, battle-tested platform with real strengths. Here are the scenarios where you should pick GAT-Ship over Base, honestly.

Scenario 1

You are a low-volume agency where per-port-call pricing is cheaper

GAT-Ship recommends roughly 300 to 500 port calls per year as a minimum for its pricing to make sense, and under that threshold the per-port-call model can run cheaper than a per-user tier. If you are a smaller agency running occasional calls, do the math both ways. GAT-Ship is a legitimately cheaper answer at low volume.

Scenario 2

You are a Nordic or European agency where GAT-Ship has deep local presence

GAT-Ship was founded in Norway and has three decades of customer references across Nordic and European agency markets. If your team hires from that talent pool, your auditors know the reports, and your partner agencies already use it, the local network effect is real and you should weigh it seriously.

Scenario 3

You only need ops and want to keep your existing accounting system separate

If your finance team is committed to its ERP and wants a REST API export model from the operations tool rather than a native accounting integration, GAT-Ship is built exactly for that split. Base is built for teams that want ops and finance in one place. If that is not your preference, GAT-Ship fits more cleanly.

Scenario 4

You are already deeply integrated and the switching cost outweighs the benefit

If your team has fifteen years of GAT-Ship history, custom reports, and trained agents across multiple offices, the cost of migration may outweigh the benefit of switching. Base is worth evaluating for your next office or new business line, but a wholesale replacement is not always the right call. We will tell you that on the demo.

Embedded Intelligence
Sanctions screening
Vessel and counterparty, live
Vessel compliance
PSC inspections, detentions
Tariff and HTS lookup
Inside the port call

Embedded Intelligence: Sanctions, Compliance, Tariffs

GAT-Ship has no embedded compliance or intelligence data. Base ships with sanctions screening, vessel compliance, and tariff lookup live in the platform. Your team checks compliance during the port call, not after the fact in a separate tool with a separate login.

What Agencies Told Us After Switching

We spoke with port agency teams that evaluated both tools, and in some cases ran a parallel pilot. The pattern was consistent, GAT-Ship got them far on operations, then the financial side and principal questions forced the next decision.

“We ran GAT-Ship for nine years and knew every corner of it. The moment that changed was when our principals started asking for real-time visibility. Base Connect was the wedge. We piloted one office, then rolled out.”
O
Operations Director
multi-port agency, bulk and tankers
“The REST API export worked, but every month our finance team was still reconciling charges to QuickBooks by hand. Having multi-stage approvals and AP OCR live in the same platform as the port call was the thing we did not know we needed until we saw it.”
F
Finance Lead
regional agency with multiple offices
“GAT-Ship was solid on SOFs and NOR and we never had a complaint. What made us move was sanctions and vessel compliance. Those were two separate tools our compliance team logged into. Now they are inside the port call workflow.”
P
Port Captain
independent agency, mixed fleet

GAT-Ship Alternative

See How Base Compares to GAT-Ship in Your Workflow

A Base demo walks a real port call the way your agents run it today. We will respect where GAT-Ship is strong, show you where Base does something different, and be honest about whether switching makes sense for your volume and market. No canned pitch, your vessel, your ports.

“We did not want to hear that GAT-Ship was bad. We wanted to hear what would actually change day to day. The honest comparison was what made the decision easy.”

– Operations Director, multi-port agency

See how Base solves your biggest challenges

Run Port Calls and Finance in One Platform

Port agencies that move from GAT-Ship to Base typically have the port call workflow, accounting sync, and principal visibility working within two to three weeks.

GAT-Ship vs Base FAQ

It depends on the job. For the core port call workflow, SOFs, NOR, crew changes, PDA and FDA generation, both tools do the work. Base wins if you want native financial management, a principal portal, and embedded compliance and intelligence inside the same platform. GAT-Ship wins if you are a low-volume agency where per-port-call pricing is cheaper, or a Nordic agency where its local presence and customer references matter.
Yes. Most agencies go live on Base in two to three weeks. You import vendor records, charge codes, open port calls, and your principal list, configure the QuickBooks or Xero sync, and run your next port call in Base in parallel. We do not require a professional services statement of work.
GAT-Ship uses per-port-call pricing, which is transparent and can be cheaper at low volumes (under roughly 300 calls per year). Base uses per-user tiered pricing, which becomes more predictable and often cheaper as your agency scales. Do the math both ways based on your actual volume.
GAT-Ship exports to accounting systems via a REST API, which is a custom integration project for your team or a partner to build against your ERP. Base ships with native QuickBooks and Xero sync out of the box, with every FDA line carrying its job, vessel, and port context into the ledger.
The three patterns we hear most are: principals started asking for real-time visibility and GAT-Ship has no principal portal, finance was still reconciling port call charges to accounting by hand, and compliance work (sanctions, vessel checks) was happening in separate tools outside the port call workflow.
Base is a modern platform built for the current maritime stack. GAT-Ship has been on the market since 1995 and has thirty years of incumbency. We are honest that maturity is a real GAT-Ship advantage, and we are also honest that some of the patterns our customers want (native accounting sync, principal portals, embedded intelligence) are easier to build from scratch than to retrofit into a thirty-year-old codebase.
No. GAT-Ship has no principal-facing portal. Principals see DAs via email after the port call closes. Base Connect gives principals real-time visibility into the audit trail while the call is still open, so charge questions get answered in the same record instead of a reply thread.
If you use QuickBooks or Xero, Base syncs natively with no custom build. If you use a different ERP, we also support API-level integration, similar to GAT-Ship. The honest answer: if your current setup is a mature GAT-Ship REST API export into a legacy ERP and it works, that is a fair reason to stay.
GAT-Ship handles 100,000+ port calls per year across its customer base, so the model scales. The tradeoff is that per-port-call costs grow linearly with your volume. Base per-user tiers are flatter as you grow, which is why high-volume agencies running the math often find Base cheaper at scale.
Most agencies are live in two to three weeks. Vendor records, charge codes, and open port calls import first. Your next port call runs in Base alongside GAT-Ship for a parallel window, then you cut over. No implementation project, no enterprise sales cycle on the Base side.

Ready to get started?

See how Base works for your operation.