Base vs Enqlare

Enqlare is broader than pure port agency software. It covers port calls, chartering management, and laytime with digital SOFs (eSOF), and is used by over 80 agencies worldwide. Base focuses deeper on the agent daily workflow, AP automation, and native accounting sync. Here is how the two compare for an agency deciding how much scope it needs in one platform.

Part of our 10-tool port agency software comparison

Enqlare
Port calls + chartering + laytime
Digital SOF (eSOF)
Chartering + laytime module
Per module pricing
Base
Agent ops, finance, principal portal
Full port call with SOFs, NOR
Native QB and Xero sync
AP automation, per user pricing

How Enqlare and Base Compare

Enqlare goes wide across chartering, laytime, and port calls. Base goes deep on agent ops and finance. Both approaches are legitimate, here is the tradeoff.

Today
With Base
Port calls with digital SOF (eSOF)
Port calls with SOF, NOR, crew, vendor POs
Chartering and laytime module included
No chartering module, deeper agent finance
Per module pricing, licence per feature
Per user transparent pricing, one platform
Financial export to external accounting
Native QuickBooks and Xero sync
Used by 80 plus agencies worldwide
Agencies plus maritime teams across regions

Feature Comparison

Enqlare goes wide across roles. Base goes deep on agent finance workflow.

Feature Enqlare Base
Built forAgents plus charterersAgents plus principals, finance focus
Port call ops (SOF, NOR, crew) (eSOF)
Chartering management module
Laytime calculationPartial
Native QuickBooks / Xero sync
AP automation and PO matchingExport focused
Principal portalPartial (Base Connect)
Embedded sanctions screening
Embedded vessel compliance dataPartial
Pricing modelPer module licencesPer user transparent tiers

Based on public documentation as of April 2026. If anything is wrong, tell us and we will correct it.

Native Finance, Not Per Module Licences

Enqlare treats finance as an export target, and charges for each module you turn on. Base treats finance as the core workflow. Every vendor PO, invoice, and FDA line lives on the same port call record, with multi stage AP approvals and native sync to QuickBooks or Xero. No per module surprise at renewal.

Finance Workflow
Vendor PO raised
Base port call record
Invoice received and matched
Stage 1 of 3 approval
FDA approved
Finance lead sign off
Posted to QuickBooks
No rekeying

When Enqlare Is the Better Choice

Honest case for picking Enqlare over Base.

Scenario 1

Your business is both port agency and chartering under the same roof

Enqlare covers chartering and laytime natively. Base does not. If you genuinely run a chartering desk alongside your agency operation and want one platform for both, Enqlare is the more direct fit. Base is deeper on the agent side but stops before the charter party.

Scenario 2

Laytime calculation is a core weekly workflow for you

Enqlare runs full laytime calculations from the eSOF out of the box. Base handles laytime partially through SOF data and exports, but does not have a dedicated laytime module. If laytime owner review is a core part of your operation, Enqlare saves you a step.

Looking At More Than Two Tools?

See the Full 10-Tool Comparison

DA-Desk, CargoWise, GAT-Ship, bluVerve, Pelican, PortPal, Enqlare, MagicPort, HarborLab, and Base. Feature table, decision framework, honest tradeoffs.

Read the Full Comparison

Base vs Enqlare

See the Agent Finance Workflow in Action

Walk through a real port call the way your agents run it today. We will show the PDA and FDA flow, the AP approval queue, and how the FDA lands in QuickBooks or Xero without rekeying. No canned demo.

“We looked at Enqlare because of chartering. In the end we kept the chartering workflow in a separate tool and went with Base for the agency side. The accounting sync was the tipping point.”

– Finance Director, multi office agency

See how Base solves your biggest challenges

Depth on the Agent Side, Clean on the Finance Side

Ops and finance on one record, one platform, one per user price. Book a demo and we will walk your real vessel through the platform.

Base vs Enqlare FAQ

No. Base focuses on the agent side of the port call and the finance workflow around it. If chartering is a core workflow you need in the same platform, Enqlare is a closer fit. Many of our customers run chartering in a separate dedicated tool and use Base for the agent operation.
Partially. SOF timestamps in Base feed laytime exports you can hand to your owner or charterer. A dedicated laytime calculation module is not part of Base today. Enqlare has more depth here.
Native accounting sync to QuickBooks and Xero, AP automation with PO matching, the Base Connect principal portal, embedded sanctions screening, and embedded vessel compliance data. Base also uses per user pricing rather than per module licences, which tends to be cleaner for agencies scaling teams.
Yes, for the port agency side. Base imports vendor records, port tariffs, vessel history, and open port calls from Enqlare exports. Most migrations take two to three weeks from contract to live.
Base publishes per-user pricing on our pricing page. Enqlare quotes per customer with per module licences. Most agent teams find Base is simpler to budget once you scale.
Yes. Base Connect gives your principal a login to the port call and a live PDA view, with sanctions and compliance context visible on the counterparty.

Ready to get started?

See how Base works for your operation.